KUBARK COUNTERINTELLIGENCE INTERROGATION MANUAL PDF
May 28, 2020 | by admin
This page report, classified Secret, was drafted in July as a comprehensive guide for training interrogators in the art of obtaining. during the opening or reconnaissance phases of the interrogation. KUBARK Manual: A User’s Guide to Torture? – The KUBARK manual was written by the CIA in the s as a means of standardizing interrogation techniques.
|Published (Last):||19 February 2012|
|PDF File Size:||7.95 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.37 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
General Remarks B.
He might even go back to your Soviet case officer and countterintelligence that you haven’t returned because you agreed to stay here and work for us. The causes of intense concealed anxiety are too complex and subtle to permit discussion of the subject in this paper. The ideal solution would be to avoid all categorizing.
It also intensifies in the source the feeling of being cut off from friendly aid. But the assumption of hostility — or at least the use of pressure tactics at the first encounter — may make difficult subjects even out of those who would respond to recognition of individuality and an initial assumption of good will. He is not able to withstand very much pressure; he reacts to a challenge not by increasing his efforts but rather by running away to avoid conflict.
The former interrogatee is especially likely to be a future trouble-maker if during interrogation he was subjected to a form of compulsion imposed from outside himself.
I know I will not be tortured and that under the procedures of western law I can conduct myself boldly. A principal goal during the opening phase is to confirm the personality assessment obtained through screening and to allow the interrogator to gain innterrogation deeper understanding of the source as an individual.
Throughout the eleven hundred pages of the manuals, there are few mentions of democracy, human rights, or the counterintelligencce of law.
U.S. Army and CIA interrogation manuals – Wikipedia
Southern Command advised governments in Latin America that the manuals contained passages that did not represent U. The interrogator can abet the process by making occasional notes — or pretending to do so — on items that seem important to the interrogatee but are not of intelligence value. Arrangements are usually made to record the interrogation, transmit it to another room, or do both. Handwritten changes were also introduced haphazardly into the text.
KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation – Wikisource, the free online library
It is a profound mistake to write off a successfully resistant interrogatee or one countfrintelligence questioning was ended before his potential was exhausted. Sometimes such people actually commit crimes in order to confess and be punished. In fact, it is likely to be a failure, and the interrogator should not be dissuaded from the effort to establish rapport by an inward conviction that no man in his right mind would incriminate himself by providing the kind of information that is sought.
An ounce of investigation may be worth a pound of questions. The history of interrogation is full of confessions and other self-incriminations that were in essence the result of a substitution of the interrogation world for the world outside. The kind and intensity of anticipated resistance is estimated. In the June 11 to 18, four-part series, The Baltimore Sun printed excerpts of an interview with Florencio Caballero, countdrintelligence former member of Battalion Therefore they claim as kubarl right privileges not permitted others.
Or he may remain silent when accused, enjoying the “punishment. It is important to understand that interrogation, as both situation and process, does of itself exert significant external pressure upon the interrogatee as long as he is not permitted to accustom himself to it.
The approach of the psychologists is customarily manipulative; that is, they suggest methods of imposing controls or alterations upon the kibark from the outside.
Is there a torture manual?
Agents, for example, are accustomed to counterintslligence questioned repeatedly and professionally. Rebuffed in early efforts to attach themselves to another, they become distrustful of attachments and turn inward.
The peculiar intimacy of the interrogation situation and the very fact that the interrogator has deliberately fostered rapport will often lead kkbark subject to talk about his doubts, fears, and kubxrk personal reactions. Once it is established that the source is probably a counterintelligence target in other words, is probably a member of a foreign intelligence or security service, a Communist, or a part of any other group engaged in clandestine activity directed against the national securitythe interrogation is planned and conducted coutnerintelligence.
Dismissal or prompt referral of the mentally ill to professional specialists will save time and money. Although the brand of torture the CIA devised through more than a decade of trial and error may not inflict physical pain, it can still do some real damage.
Moreover, emotional-psychological schematizations sometimes present atypical extremes rather than the kinds of people commonly encountered by interrogators.
Suspicion against a single cellmate may sometimes be broken down if he shows intsrrogation source a hidden microphone that he has “found” and suggests that they talk only in whispers at the other end of the room. On the other hand, there are valid objections to the adoption of cultural-geographic categories for interrogation purposes however valid they may be as KUCAGE concepts.
Such comments as, “That must have been a bad time for you and your family,” or “Yes, I can see why you were angry,” or “It sounds exciting” are sufficiently innocuous not to distract the subject, yet provide adequate evidence of sympathetic interest.
Detention poses the most common of counterintelliegnce legal problems. The confession contains kubarrk salient facts, but they are distorted; the confession shows that A is attempting to throw the entire responsibility upon B. Army and CIA interrogation manuals are seven controversial military training manuals which were declassified by the Pentagon in